Saturday, March 28, 2020

Each Went to His Own House


Each Went to His Own House


Piety
Nicodemus, one of their members who had come to him earlier, said to them, “Does our law condemn a man before it first hears him and finds out what he is doing?” They answered and said to him, “You are not from Galilee also, are you? Look and see that no prophet arises from Galilee.” Then each went to his own house. John 7:50-52

Study
Reading today’s Gospel, I was struck by the thought that “social distancing” is not a new phenomenon.  Nicodemus was the first Pharisee willing and able (even though under cover of darkness) to venture into a direct encounter and dialogue with Jesus.  He did not keep his six-foot (four cubits) distance.  Today, this pharisee appears for the second time in John’s Gospel as an unlikely defender of Jesus.  In reaction to his attitude of openness, he faces the accusation that he is a stranger among his supposed peers.  The Pharisees in the Jerusalem temple accuse Nicodemus of being from Galilee. 

Nicodemus attempts to reconcile (“converge”) his spirituality with that of the itinerant preacher-carpenter from Nazareth.  That effort does not (yet) succeed today. He and the Samaritan woman at the well might be the first “Cursillistas” in the New Testament as they attempt to bring their friends to Jesus. The Pharisees reject Nicodemus and his openness to Jesus.  They want to remain in the comfort and isolation of their separate world.  Perhaps tellingly, the last line of today’s Good News reveals all in its literalism and symbolism: “Then each went to his own house.” Although one person senses that the world is changing, the rest refuse to give in to the winds of change. They want to stay the course.

Nicodemus reminds me of the kind of somewhat sympathetic character who might appear at home in a Flannery O’Connor short story. In “Everything Rises that Must Converge,” death and destruction accompany the moment of “epiphany” for the main character Julian Chestny.  That will come to John’s narrative, just not today.

“Everything Rises”[i] takes its title from the works of Rev. Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, SJ.  Teilhard attempted to integrate religion and science. He speculated that the evolutionary process was producing a higher and higher level of consciousness and that ultimately that consciousness, now become spiritual, would be complete when it merged with the Divine Consciousness at the Omega point. At that time, God would become “all in all.” In The Phenomenon of Man, Teilhard argues that our goal is not to be found in individuality but in the surrender of our ego to the Divine: “The true ego grows in inverse proportion to ‘egotism.’” We can, he argues, “only find our person by uniting together.” After all, as St. Paul puts it, we all have “the same Master in heaven, who treats everyone alike.”

In “Everything Rises,” O’Connor depicts Mrs. Chestny, the mother of the protagonist, as one who “finds her person by uniting together” despite her racially prejudiced attitudes ingrained from her childhood.  She was a widow, but “struggled fiercely” to put her protagonist-son Julian through school.  At the time of the story, she is still supporting him a year after graduation while he is a typewriter salesman, not a writer. “Her teeth had gone unfilled so that his could be straightened,” and she even offers to take off her hat when she thinks that it might be the cause of his irritated, “grief-stricken” face. She attempts to converse (unite) with the woman and the boy on the bus while Julian retreats behind a used newspaper.

Conversely, Julian sees everything in terms of his own “individuality.”  He comments on society from behind the mask of his “liberal” education and place in the community.  Despite his “holier-than-thou” attitude toward his mother, he takes what Teilhard describes as “the dangerous course of seeking fulfillment in isolation.”  The omniscient narrator tells us Julian likes to spend most of his time by withdrawing into a kind of mental bubble, especially when things around him are a bother. In that bubble, “he was safe from any kind of penetration from without.” Within that bubble, he creates an image of himself and the world around him. These are images, however, which have no validity with his misplaced enlightenment while he looks down on his mother.

Julian is like those Pharisees retreating to their private domains and attempting to wall off the forces of change about to descend upon Jerusalem.  The arrest, trial, and capital punishment of the carpenter’s God-son are imminent. Spoiler alert:  Julian is “rewarded” in the end with the life of isolation that he wants.

Action
In our locked-down, shelter-in-place time, it is very easy to see how we might become isolated “Pharisites.”  We must resist those temptations by not forgetting to stay in daily touch with our piety-study-action tripod. Let's remember that someday, we will emerge from this time of confinement and we have to keep up with the practices that define us.   

No comments: